|
|
themeable....and intricate. Yes, I think you guys put together a really nice piece here.
**edit**
No, I'm now bowing to pressure, the "99.4" score was the result of leaving out a 0 when typing the rank for this wallpaper in. I just noticed.
Tue, Mar 23rd at 02:02pm (5 years ago)
|
|
|
What's up with the title?
Tue, Mar 23rd at 12:07am (5 years ago)
|
|
|
the colors are the best part. Nice complementary and the open space is perfect. The pixel drag is a little old but understandable. Nice photo 2d mix.
Tue, Mar 23rd at 12:07am (5 years ago)
|
|
|
|
|
|
I sure as hell don't know. You lippy son of a bitch. edit: Hoo boy. I'm pretty suprised at the rating. Senex and myself did not invest tons of time in this. I personally would say it's worth an 75-80-ish score, but if ds likes it, he likes it. It is all subjective you know........
I'll stick up a link to the orig. photo this p.m., so if anyone else wants a crack at it they can.
Tue, Mar 23rd at 12:33am (5 years ago)
|
|
|
I think it would have been better without the pixel blur. Actually the image probably would have looked 10 times better and maybe the image enlarged just a bit more. Those things would make this wallpaper supurb imo. It still looks great :)
Tue, Mar 23rd at 01:48am (5 years ago)
|
|
|
guys, this is great! i love the original photo and this remix! my favorite part of the wall is the 2-d elements along the right side. very nice. *clamors for another collab*
Tue, Mar 23rd at 03:33am (5 years ago)
|
|
|
very good work... I adore the blur in made general. The colors are beautiful, that gives desire for going to take glass (if it is a restaurant héhé)
Tue, Mar 23rd at 06:27am (5 years ago)
|
|
|
The photo manip part of it is generally pretty cool. I don't care for the squares, circles and random messiness at the top, however. And the pixel stretch just seems to detract. The colors aren't my thing but they work somewhat here. I would think a scaled down version of the photo manip without the stretch would be much better.
Tue, Mar 23rd at 07:43am (5 years ago)
|
|
|
Squares and circles and stuff could be better left out. The photo-manip is nice work but it's ins't worth 99.
Tue, Mar 23rd at 09:27am (5 years ago)
|
|
|
I like it . .it looks the inside of a store or mall of some kind . . . hehe, the foreground reminds me of smooth tile floors. An interesting concept. I do find the blur irritating, and it seems to obscure the kind of detail that, were it more visible/sharper, woulod have made this piece better, IMHO.
The style has been done before, but the picture of what seems to be a mall/storefront or concourse of some kind is wonderfully original.
Tue, Mar 23rd at 11:04am (5 years ago)
|
|
|
this is perfectly balanced, uses color to great effect, and is fantastic to theme around. senex and c72 are both without a doubt the cream of the crop here - if you don't understand the high rating, it's your problem, not theirs.
Tue, Mar 23rd at 11:07am (5 years ago)
|
|
|
Well done guys! Definitely tones of c72 in there =P CHAIRS!
Tue, Mar 23rd at 12:23pm (5 years ago)
|
|
|
there's no need for the 99 but the makers of this piece who may eventually deserve it. I would (and I did) give this nice wallpaper a 93, seems fair to me, it's a nice wall. LOL, nice mistake ;)
Tue, Mar 23rd at 12:42pm (5 years ago)
|
|
|
i don´t know what to say. i am really confused. you are a great guy darksheer. i fall on my knees, really
Tue, Mar 23rd at 12:54pm (5 years ago)
|
|
|
Points for style, originality, with a hint of trendiness. i can't explain why, I just really like it. My only explanation is the composition, and the elements you have working in there. Excellent work.
Tue, Mar 23rd at 01:25pm (5 years ago)
|
|
|
props for images working for me again on this site. and i heart colossus. really bubbly and nice image.
Tue, Mar 23rd at 01:36pm (5 years ago)
|
|
|
good.
Tue, Mar 23rd at 01:57pm (5 years ago)
|
|
|
the stuff on the right is great but the blurry horizontal lines don't work and the color is lacking, more white than I know what to do with with.
Tue, Mar 23rd at 04:06pm (5 years ago)
|
|
|
Very nice, only bad thing is that i need to find a winamp and shellstyle to go with this :(
-Gaz
Tue, Mar 23rd at 07:07pm (5 years ago)
|
|
|
most of the time I don't care about pixel drag, but this time I do; the ones coming of the chairs are unnecessary, the ones below looks cool. And I wonder how c72, begging such a big guy, took that photo, with that perspective, without looking like a complete crazy =P
Tue, Mar 23rd at 09:35pm (5 years ago)
|
|
|
+ for the photo, vivid orange and white i don't like other colors used, especially in the pixel drag. I'm not really sure about the position and the size of the photo used - i'd like it more if it would be scaled down like to 50% and somewhere nearer the bottom of the wall..
Wed, Mar 24th at 12:16pm (5 years ago)
|
|
|
like sex with my eyes!
Wed, Mar 24th at 01:50pm (5 years ago)
|
|
|
very nice photo manip guys....great stuff
Wed, Mar 24th at 03:12pm (5 years ago)
|
|
|
Hm........... Good colour mix. but i dislike the 'extension' of the pixel in this wall. Kinda not match with the photo. But i like the circles and squares. Good job.
Sat, Mar 27th at 09:02am (5 years ago)
|
|
|
gaussian blur is used too much for my taste. i don't quite dig pixel stretch- there are times when it is used well, but not in this piece imo. on one hand you have almost a retro-ish feel on the side but it gets kind of thrown off and distracted by the stretch.
Mon, Oct 18th at 02:22pm (5 years ago)
|
To post comments, you need to become a member. It's free, and takes just a few seconds to complete!
|
) or from the image's palette (
).
To save your palette, you must sign up.
VictorC: I don't know. ***edit*** What colossus said.