site too small

To support lower screen resolutions I would guess, like 800X600! I'm at 1280X1024 and I have alot of "free space" on the right too!

--== The Snowman ==--
Keeper of the largest private online collection in the world!
= The Skinventory

Aye, that's my major complaint with Custo. Widen the center table. It'll look a lot better.

You'll have to increase the length of the line under the "ad" though.

Dust, PR Lackey,

but then again if tables wasn't "fixed", screen resolution wouldn't matter........ ;)

--== The Snowman ==--
Keeper of the largest private online collection in the world!
= The Skinventory

i personally hate % in website widths. i would much rather manually resize my browser window to the size of the design than have it stretch all the way to hell and back. im in 1600x1200 and the site looks fine. but then again i dont FULLSCREEN my browser window while im viewing sites like most everyone does....

I never ever go full screen (except with PhotoShop), always browsing in windows of about 7-800 pixels wide. /me kicks fixed table widths

well, precurser caught what i was gonna say.

Do you really _have_ to have the window maxed and taking up the whole screen?

just center the main table that all the sub tables are in, it's that simple.

I don't really care if there's space, just as long as the actual content looks fine.

---------------
wyattg
"Where people go, politics follow." -Bruce Sterling