SirWonkus: love the concept (especially the scroll bar) those are great photos, so maybe try and improve the thumbnails (maybe increase the bottom, too). fate: nice and simple design, but the links don't work for me at all (Opera). DS2D: not much can be done if you're limited to that frame (bottom seems a little off), but you do know good design. downtown: the links aren't obvious, especially since title tags don't work so well for humans :) You should be fine without the ohyes div, since it looks better cut off than with a scroll bar. motorist: your works are really memorable, although I don't think you need them at such a high resolution. It's a neat site, but it doesn't seem well structured Pyro: I'd up the line spacing on the blog, but otherwise it's as cool as I remember it adz: not much to comment on, but I like the earthly colour scheme
If it doesn't work, I'll shrug. Horribly ugly for custo standards.
hah, fraster, stay away from sites like that, you just end up with a shitty page filled with 90's design elements. I think google has decent free web space if you have a mail account with them
Thanks mailmerge for the comments. The site is currently just used to update visitors on the work going on for the new site. Keep reading the progress updates every month before I roll out the finished product!
I think it would aide visitors to view more of your work if you defined your lightbox images in a set as opposed to single images. You do that by just putting a group name in the square brackets. That way people can quickly "thumb through" your images with out have to to click in and out of each one which gets kind of annoying when I am trying to look at a bunch of your images.